Urban homestead failure still a frugal success
If, as I do, one reads many books and blogs espousing a culture of frugality and anti-consumerism, one will quickly and repeatedly cross paths with the cousin community of urban homesteaders and do-it-yourselfers.
I am seduced by the whole idea of urban homesteading, for reasons of both ethics and aesthetics. But I fear I am a near-total failure at actually doing it.
A proper homesteading housewife is supposed to, at the very least, be an expert at: vegetable and herb gardening, chicken raising, home canning, cooking and baking. Extra points awarded if you also brew beer or make wine, or keep bees or goats, or make your own cheese. Serious carpentry and construction chops are required too, unless you have a spouse whoâ€™s happy to pitch in and build chicken coops and lettuce tables upon request.
I can only claim street cred in cooking. Everything else, I watch other people do. I look at photos of sassy chickens and voluptuous tomatoes and orderly Ball-jar pantries from afar, with admiration and a wistfulness that sometimes edges into guilt. I feel the pressure to do ALL THE THINGS.
But itâ€™s not just the perception that â€˜everyone else is doing thisâ€™ that drives me. I spent a good two decades fully intending that someday I would be a home gardener. It started with a project in my ninth-grade biology class: each student got a small plot in which she could plant two vegetables of her choice. I chose green beans and okra.
We tended that garden all semester long, and near the end we got to pick our harvest and bring it home. The experience of making something out of almost nothing — a few tiny seeds and some water — was transformative. In the end, I had enough of each vegetable to make a single meal for my parents and myself. I was so proud of the accomplishment … Iâ€™d almost call it joy.
Iâ€™ve made the occasional stab at minor gardening as an adult, but circumstances had never permitted more. When we bought this house — the first time Iâ€™d ever lived in a non-rental — I thought this was my chance to dig into some real gardening at last.
By the time weâ€™d finished settling in, I’d missed the garden-starting window for the year, so I contented myself with buying a couple of cherry tomato starts and installing them in containers on the back deck.
I quickly learned that tomatoes must be watered EVERY SINGLE MORNING without fail or Bad Things start to happen. This was a lot to ask on top of a clock-punching day job and a 45-minute morning commute, especially for someone who is Not a Morning Person. Despite my regular lapses in this area, we did have some lovely tomatoes. (Especially the Sun Golds. If you want to grow cherry tomatoes, I cannot recommend Sun Golds highly enough.) And eating them was a pleasure, certainly … but a mild one, compared to my recollection of fourteen-year-old first-time gardening joy.
For a few years now Iâ€™ve lacked both job and commute, which seems like it would make me the perfect candidate for full-scale gardening. But each year I weigh the downsides — my bad knee which makes any sort of ground-level work quite painful, the fact that we canâ€™t expect to be living in this house for multiple growing seasons, the hours Iâ€™d have to steal from all the other projects Iâ€™m invested in — and sign up for a CSA share instead.
I am definitely not doing ALL THE THINGS. Iâ€™m not even doing most of the things.
How do I fight off the subsequent feelings of inadequacy? In part, with cold hard numbers.
As best I can tell, my failure to homestead isnâ€™t negatively impacting our bottom line. Most of these activities are not money-savers; on the contrary, they can easily turn into money sinks.
I found this more than a little surprising, when I first looked into it, because â€˜common wisdomâ€™ says that doing-it-yourself saves money. But as it turns out, DIY is hardly a synonym for frugality. Here are how four of the most popular homesteading activities stack up, financially:
Compared with buying eggs from comparably-raised chickens at the grocery or farmersâ€™ market, raising your own chickens is a break-even venture at best — and thatâ€™s with a lot of luck (as regards predation, chick gender, and illness) and some highly creative cost-cutting measures (in the areas of shelter construction and feed). The numbers donâ€™t improve much with subsequent years, and many people end up hundreds or even thousands of dollars in the hole.
Backyard chickens are trendy, so a lot of people have done the math. Check out Joshua Levinâ€™s article on Backyard Chicken Economics for a best-case scenario, as well as chapter two of Jennifer Reeseâ€™s Make the Bread, Buy the Butter for one of the worst. After reading a number of such stories, buying eggs from your hip chicken-raising neighbor may start to sound like a much better idea.
If youâ€™re new to vegetable gardening, the first year is likely to be a money-loser, due to the cost of infrastructure setup and a general learning curve. However, if you stick with it for a second full year — and are lucky with pests and weather — you may creep a few hundred dollars into the black. The bad news is that even after years of practice, you still wonâ€™t be making minimum wage for your labor. See J.D. Rothâ€™s three years of meticulously recorded Garden Project data, and Michael Tortorelloâ€™s Starter Garden blog.
Gardening is also going to be a personal loss if you end up giving away (or worse, composting) the excess because you donâ€™t have a plan for preservation. Planting only what you need is a nice idea, but Nature just isnâ€™t predictable enough for that. Every garden report Iâ€™ve seen talks about winding up with too much of one thing and not enough of something else. Which brings us to …
You have to be a serious gardener to make the math work out in favor of home canning. Even if you mostly buy used, recouping your initial investment into jars and canning equipment requires cheap produce in significant quantities, and a couple of container plants or one trip to a you-pick farm is not going to cut it. Pressure canners are particularly expensive, but without one youâ€™re limited to the water bath method, which is only safe for preserving tomatoes, fruit jams, and pickles. (And you canâ€™t use a water bath on a glass-top induction stove.)
If you do have a big garden, then you can rack up some savings — maybe not in the first year, but definitely by the second. But remember, those are the same dollars youâ€™re gaining from gardening, not additional ones. And though I had no luck finding any documentation of the total time spent canning, you can be certain that once you add in those hours your equivalent wage, already low from gardening, drops even farther. On the other hand, since the ongoing expenses of canning are small — just $10-$15 in supplies each year after the first, according to this fact sheet from the University of Kentucky — it gets more lucrative as the years go by.
In fact, of all the major homesteading skills, the one I do regularly engage in — home cooking — is generally thought to be the most financially effective. Perversely, itâ€™s the least well-documented and hardest to calculate. Mark Bittman did a cost analysis of two simple homemade meals against McDonalds fast food, but part of his point was that the two things werenâ€™t even close to equivalent in nutrition. And although the home meals were much less expensive, Bittman didnâ€™t include in his calculations the cost of energy and labor involved in home cooking — costs which are included in the price of fast food.
In my case, in order to accurately compare my cooking against the cost of restaurant meals of similar quality and nutrition, Iâ€™d need expense data broken out in ways I donâ€™t currently track. Items like toilet paper and pet food would have to be subtracted from the â€˜groceryâ€™ budget, and the cost of cookware, appliances, and servingware added in. Plus Iâ€™d need to calculate a portion of cooking gas, water, and electricity, and track hours of labor.
So while the substantial drop in our total expenses indicates we must be saving money by cooking over eating in restaurants, I canâ€™t quantify exactly how much, or how that stacks up against the hours I put into shopping, planning, preparation, and cleanup. Besides which, Iâ€™ve already collected a kitchen full of high-quality appliances and cookware; it would not surprise me too much if, just as with chickens and gardens, it would take a brand new cook a couple of years to recoup startup costs.
Iâ€™ve only covered four popular DIY skills, but I suspect itâ€™s a similar story for all the rest. I have a good friend whoâ€™s a blue-ribbon knitter — she sells original patterns, speaks at knitting conventions, and teaches classes — and she frankly admits that she doesnâ€™t even make back her yarn supply costs. For her, thatâ€™s never been the point.
I think the main lesson here is: if you want to grow, raise, or make your own anything, do so because the result is better, or the process is enjoyable, or (ideally) both — not purely because itâ€™s cheaper, because thereâ€™s a good chance itâ€™s not. As Michael Tortorello says, â€œIf gardening were ultimately about cash yields, weâ€™d all move to California and plant medical marijuana.â€
If keeping costs down is important — if the idea of sinking hundreds of unrecoverable dollars into a homesteading project causes you some alarm — donâ€™t start anything that you donâ€™t intend to stick with for at least two full years, and preferably more. Not sure if youâ€™ll like it? Try finding, or making, a friend whoâ€™s been doing it for a few years and is willing to let you help out. That way you can get a taste of the long-term reality, while picking up important details that will help you succeed if you do give it a go on your own.
The non-monetary benefits of cooking — satisfaction, pleasure, pride, enjoyment, health — would make it worthwhile for me even if it didnâ€™t save us a cent. So far, that hasnâ€™t been true for any of the other popular self-sufficiency skills.
But I am still able to vicariously enjoy other peopleâ€™s homesteading projects — for a mere fraction of the satisfaction, true, but none of the work!