How American culture is causing widespread misery
One of the fun things about reading extensively in different disciplines — psychology, history, sociology, economics — is that I sometimes encounter essentially identical motifs in unrelated sources.
For example, I recently ran across a striking quote from President Jimmy Carterâ€™s 1979 â€œCrisis of Confidenceâ€ speech, in which he acknowledged the declining trust in government, and then went on to lament:
In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But weâ€™ve discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. Weâ€™ve learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose.
The warning against hamster-wheel consumerism has been a recurring theme throughout dozens of books and psychology studies Iâ€™ve read in the past few years, but the connection Carter made to the erosion of our social identities is less common, and immediately put me in mind of Martin Seligman.
One of the most influential psychologists of the past century, Seligman revolutionized the scientific understanding of depression in the seventies and eighties by proving that depression is, quite simply, the state of â€˜learned helplessnessâ€™. It is the giving-up that follows from the belief that nothing you do can make things any better.
â€œLife is inevitably full of personal failures,â€ says Seligman in his book Learned Optimism. â€œWe rarely get all we aspire to. Frustration, defeat, and rejection are daily experiences.â€ What matters most, according to his research, is whether you respond to setbacks and losses from a position of optimism and energy, or pessimism and malaise.
In the 1980s several large studies showed an alarming surge in the incidence of depression among Americans. People born in the 1950s had been depressed ten times as often as those born in the the 1920s, even though the latter had lived twice as long. People who were thirty years old in 1980 were twenty times more likely to have experienced depression than people who were thirty in 1940. Surveys in 2006 and 2008 by the CDC suggest that one in eleven Americans is depressed at any given moment.
Seligman believes that this unprecedented psychological misery is the result of the confluence of two societal trends: a growing focus on individualism, and a declining commitment to the common good.
As our culture shifted to exalt the benefits of personal choice and individual success, Seligman explains, we were also losing confidence in the larger constructs of society. Previously, he says, Americans lived in â€œa context of meaning and hope.â€ When we encountered failure, we could take reassurance from something larger than ourselves: â€œa belief in the nation, in God, in oneâ€™s family, or in a purpose that transcends our lives.â€ But as Carter noted, in the middle of the twentieth century that reassurance began to disintegrate.
Among the Kaluli tribe of New Guinea, depression is nearly non-existent: an anthropologist who lived with them found only one instance of depression among over two thousand tribespeople in nine years. The anthropologist, Edward Schieffelin, believes this is due to an elaborate system of â€˜social reciprocityâ€™ between the individual and the tribe. For example, when a personâ€™s pig runs away, the tribe gives him another pig. Even intangible losses are subject to societal redress. Thus recompensed by the group, as Seligman writes, â€œhelplessness does not escalate into hopelessness, loss does not escalate into despair.â€
By contrast, our modern American culture glorifies â€˜bootstrappingâ€™ and â€˜self-made menâ€™, and our society offers scant comfort in the face of personal loss. We are constantly told that failure is our own fault, that if we suffer a setback or fail to substantially improve our lives it is because we are lacking in personal qualities. When help is available — as with bankruptcy, or food stamps — it comes with a crushing dose of shame attached.
In his famous 1958 book The Affluent Society, Harvard economist John Kenneth Galbraith warned that the United States had become a nation of â€œprivate opulence and public squalor,â€ much to our detriment. Then as now, American industry had become concentrated upon individually owned goods to the neglect of the corresponding public services. We have a surfeit of automobiles, but potholed roads and polluted air; we have grander houses, but not enough police to enforce our safety; we have better food, but inadequate health care; we have an abundance of televisions, but impoverished schools.
Individual development and personal freedom are wonderful things, and Iâ€™m not at all suggesting that we weaken them. But Galbraith argued for a â€˜social balanceâ€™ between private and public progress. And if Seligman is right, the cost of our current imbalance has been widespread and frequent despair.
So how do we, as individuals, reverse this trend? I offer three suggestions.
One way is to align your time and efforts with a larger community or a greater purpose. At one time, as Seligman and Carter both note, most Americans identified with their religion, family, or country.
Iâ€™m not, myself, a religious person, being of a strictly scientific mindset. My family-of-origin was not merely dysfunctional but crazy and violent — never anything from which I could draw support or comfort. I would like to have faith in my country, but honestly I think itâ€™s kind of a mess.
But there are other options for â€œa purpose that transcends our lives.â€ Iâ€™ve rearranged my priorities so that I can spend more of my time creating things that I hope will make peopleâ€™s lives better, instead of helping a corporation Sell More Stuff. I feel a sense of greater purpose every time I communicate something Iâ€™m passionate about — even the very article youâ€™re reading right now. I feel it whenever someone tells me that something Iâ€™ve written has touched or helped them.
Four years ago my life was very different: I had a lot more money, nicer possessions, and greater prestige conferred by my job. By all the outside measures of society I have come down in the world quite sharply. But I am unequivocally happier now, in large part because I have managed to create my own â€œcontext of meaning and hope.â€
Second, we need to remember that personal and societal improvements are not mutually exclusive, but inextricably interlinked. Ignoring either one devalues the other.
Think about this the next time youâ€™re filling out a ballot. Itâ€™s easy to look at a referendum and imagine the extra hundred bucks that you, personally, will lose over the next year in property taxes or car license fees. Itâ€™s harder to grasp the societal benefits — the small improvements made in thousands upon thousands of lives because people have access to library computers or another math teacher in school or a bus route that goes to their job. You canâ€™t see the cleaner air that results from better public transportation, or the economic boost that an entire community gets from better educating its children. But those gains are just as real as that hundred-dollar bill you may be afraid to lose.
Third, research has proven that altruism is an excellent antidepressant. But shopping? Not so much. President Carter had it right over thirty years ago: â€œpiling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness.â€
Next time youâ€™re feeling down, instead of indulging in â€˜retail therapyâ€™, try doing something in service of a greater good. Pick an organization — a school, a church, a nursing home, a soup kitchen — that tries to improve peopleâ€™s lives, and support it with the time and money you would otherwise spend pampering yourself.
As counter-intuitive as it may seem, the happiness youâ€™ll feel as a result will be stronger and longer-lasting. And who knows how far the ripple effects will go?